Lively Legs programme vs outpatient wound clinic: Recurrence of ulcers
Lively Legs programme showed no clear difference in recurrence of ulcers compared with wounds outpatient clinic (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Lively Legs programme vs wounds outpatient clinic Recurrence of ulcers · people with venous leg ulcers Lively Legs programme showed no clear difference in recurrence of ulcers compared with wounds outpatient clinic (low certainty). Interventions for helping people adhere to compression treatments for venous leg ulceration (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.82 [0.59, 1.14] | 1 study · 136 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for helping people adhere to compression treatments for venous leg ulceration 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.