Question · asked by 1 review

Glass ionomer-based sealant vs Resin-based sealant: Adverse events

Population
'Healthy' children with caries-free second primary molars, aged 3-5 years (schools and kindergartens, India and China)
Intervention
Glass ionomer-based sealant
Comparison
Resin-based sealant
Outcome
Adverse events

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Glass ionomer-based sealant vs Resin-based sealant (fluoride-releasing or non-fluoride-releasing)
Adverse events · 'Healthy' children with caries-free second primary molars, aged 3-5 years (schools and kindergartens, India and China)
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes
1 study reported adverse events as some discomfort such as nausea; 1 child experienced a strong gag reflex following the glass ionomer-based sealant while 8 children reported feeling uncomfortable after the fluoride…1 study · 100 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-02Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.