Question · asked by 1 review
Erbium:YAG laser vs Air-abrasive device (Perio-Flow): Marginal bone level change
- Population
- People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis
- Intervention
- Erbium:YAG laser
- Comparison
- Air-abrasive device (Perio-Flow)
- Outcome
- Marginal bone level change
Er:YAG laser showed no clear difference in radiographic marginal bone level change compared with air-abrasive device (Perio-Flow); GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Er:YAG laser vs Air-abrasive device (Perio-Flow) Radiographic marginal bone level change · People with at least one dental implant affected by peri-implantitis · 6 months Er:YAG laser showed no clear difference in radiographic marginal bone level change compared with air-abrasive device (Perio-Flow); GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | After 6 months no statistically significant difference for peri-implant marginal bone levels. | 1 study · 42 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2011-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.