Selective vs routine episiotomy: all vaginal births where operative vaginal delivery was not anticipated: Perineal infection
Selective showed no clear difference in perineal infection compared with routine episiotomy: all vaginal births where operative vaginal… (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Selective vs routine episiotomy: all vaginal births where operative vaginal delivery was not anticipated Perineal infection · Women in labour where operative delivery was not anticipated. (Women were above 16 years old and between 28… Selective showed no clear difference in perineal infection compared with routine episiotomy: all vaginal births where operative vaginal… (low certainty). Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.9 [0.45, 1.82] | 3 studies · 1467 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.