Systemic antibiotics plus antibiotic lock solutions plus tissue plasminogen activator vs systemic antibiotics plus antibiotic lock solutions plus heparin: Cure: long‐term success
It is very uncertain whether systemic antibiotics plus antibiotic lock solutions plus tissue… changes cure: long‐term success compared with systemic antibiotics plus antibiotic lock solutions plus heparin (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Systemic antibiotics plus antibiotic lock solutions plus tissue plasminogen activator vs systemic antibiotics plus antibiotic lock solutions plus heparin Cure: long‐term success · patients on maintenance HD with CRBSI It is very uncertain whether systemic antibiotics plus antibiotic lock solutions plus tissue… changes cure: long‐term success compared with systemic antibiotics plus antibiotic lock solutions plus heparin (very low certainty). Interventions for treating catheter‐related bloodstream infections in people receiving maintenance… (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 64 [0.38, 1.06] | 18 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for treating catheter‐related bloodstream infections in people receiving maintenance haemodialysis 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.