Question · asked by 1 review
Glass ionomer-based sealant vs No sealant (control/no treatment): Adverse events
- Population
- Children with caries-free primary first molars (with or without caries on other teeth), aged 1-5 years (paediatric clinic/dental school, India; community dental setting, UK)
- Intervention
- Glass ionomer-based sealant
- Comparison
- No sealant (control/no treatment)
- Outcome
- Adverse events
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Glass ionomer-based sealant vs No sealant Adverse events · Children with caries-free primary first molars (with or without caries on other teeth), aged 1-5 years (paediatric… The review found no eligible studies for this question. Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes | No studies reported this outcome. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth 2022 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2021-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Glass ionomer-based sealant vs Resin-based sealant · 'Healthy' children with caries-free second primary molars, aged 3-5 years (schools and… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.