Question · asked by 1 review

Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention: Tumour response rate Defined as number of complete remissions (no definition of complete remission provided). Best‐case analysis

It is very uncertain whether dexrazoxane changes tumour response rate Defined as number of complete remissions (no… compared with no cardioprotective intervention (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention
Tumour response rate Defined as number of complete remissions (no definition of complete remission provided). Best‐case analysis · children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
It is very uncertain whether dexrazoxane changes tumour response rate Defined as number of complete remissions (no… compared with no cardioprotective intervention (very low certainty).
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.01 [0.95, 1.07]1 study · 206 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.