Question · asked by 1 review
Benzodiazepines (lorazepam) vs Oxazepam: Global state: clinically important change in global state
- Population
- catatonia in people with schizophrenia or SMI
- Intervention
- Benzodiazepines (lorazepam)
- Comparison
- Oxazepam
- Outcome
- Global state: clinically important change in global state
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Lorazepam vs Oxazepam Global state: clinically important change in global state (as defined by individual studies) · catatonia in people with schizophrenia or SMI The review found no eligible studies for this question. Benzodiazepines for catatonia in people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illnesses (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benzodiazepines for catatonia in people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illnesses 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.