Question · asked by 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs Progestogen 2: Oocyte pick‐up cancellation

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 showed no clear difference in oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ Normo‐responders (MPA 4 mg versus… compared with progestogen 2 (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 vs Progestogen 2
Oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ Normo‐responders (MPA 4 mg versus Micronised progesterone 100 mg) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol · assisted reproduction technology cycles
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 showed no clear difference in oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ Normo‐responders (MPA 4 mg versus… compared with progestogen 2 (low certainty).
Progestogens for prevention of luteinising hormone (LH) surge in women undergoing controlled ovarian… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.81 [0.43, 1.53]1 study · 300 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 vs Progestogen 2
Oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ Normo‐responders (MPA 4 mg versus MPA 10 mg) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol · assisted reproduction technology cycles
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 showed no clear difference in oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ Normo‐responders (MPA 4 mg versus MPA… compared with progestogen 2 (moderate certainty).
Progestogens for prevention of luteinising hormone (LH) surge in women undergoing controlled ovarian… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 2.27 [0.9, 5.74]1 study · 300 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 vs Progestogen 2
Oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ Normo‐responders (MPA 4 mg versus Dydrogesterone 20 mg) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol · assisted reproduction technology cycles
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 showed no clear difference in oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ Normo‐responders (MPA 4 mg versus… compared with progestogen 2 (low certainty).
Progestogens for prevention of luteinising hormone (LH) surge in women undergoing controlled ovarian… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.19 [0.61, 2.34]1 study · 300 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 vs Progestogen 2
Oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ Normo‐responders (MPA 10 mg versus Dydrogesterone 20 mg) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol · assisted reproduction technology cycles
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 showed no clear difference in oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ Normo‐responders (MPA 10 mg versus… compared with progestogen 2 (moderate certainty).
Progestogens for prevention of luteinising hormone (LH) surge in women undergoing controlled ovarian… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.49 [0.8, 2.8]1 study · 520 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 vs Progestogen 2
Oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ Normo‐responders (Micronised progesterone 100 mg versus Micronised progesterone 200mg) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol · assisted reproduction technology cycles
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 changes oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ Normo‐responders (Micronised… compared with progestogen 2 (very low certainty).
Progestogens for prevention of luteinising hormone (LH) surge in women undergoing controlled ovarian… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.35 [0.09, 1.37]1 study · 150 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Progestogens for prevention of luteinising hormone (LH) surge in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation as part of an…
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.