SUPPORTIVE THERAPY vs usual care: Relapse
- Population
- patients with schizophrenia
- Intervention
- SUPPORTIVE THERAPY
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Relapse
It is very uncertain whether SUPPORTIVE THERAPY changes global state: Relapse compared with STANDARD CARE (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
SUPPORTIVE THERAPY vs STANDARD CARE Global state: Relapse · patients with schizophrenia It is very uncertain whether SUPPORTIVE THERAPY changes global state: Relapse compared with STANDARD CARE (very low certainty). Supportive therapy for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.96 [0.44, 2.11] | 1 study · 54 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supportive therapy for schizophrenia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- SUPPORTIVE THERAPY vs cognitive behavioural therapy · patients with schizophrenia · 1 review
- SUPPORTIVE THERAPY vs ANY OTHER PSYCHOLOGICAL OR PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT · patients with schizophrenia · 1 review
- SUPPORTIVE THERAPY vs FAMILY THERAPY · patients with schizophrenia · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.