Question · asked by 1 review
Enamel caries in primary dentition (at 5 years) vs Caries-free primary dentition: Dentinal caries in permanent (newly erupted) teeth
- Population
- School children and adolescents (6-18 years) followed from primary dentition (baseline examination before 72 months of age)
- Intervention
- Enamel caries in primary dentition (at 5 years)
- Comparison
- Caries-free primary dentition
- Outcome
- Dentinal caries in permanent (newly erupted) teeth
Enamel caries in the primary dentition is associated with about 1.6 times higher odds of dentinal caries in permanent teeth (single study; not GRADE-rated).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Enamel caries in primary dentition (at 5 years) vs Caries-free primary dentition Dentinal caries in permanent (newly erupted) teeth · School children and adolescents (6-18 years) followed from primary dentition (baseline examination before 72 months of… · 7-year follow-up, Cohort study, Norway (Saethre-Sundli 2020), Enamel caries in primary dentition Enamel caries in the primary dentition is associated with about 1.6 times higher odds of dentinal caries in permanent teeth (single study; not GRADE-rated). Does Early Childhood Caries Increase Caries Development among School Children and Adolescents? A Systematic… (2022) All outcomes | OR 1.6 [1.2, 2.0] | 1 study · 3282 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does Early Childhood Caries Increase Caries Development among School Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2022 All outcomes | Inception to 28 July 2022 (grey literature accessed 14 September 2022) | 10 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.