Question · asked by 1 review

Resin-based fissure sealant plus fluoride varnish vs Fluoride varnish: Changes in decayed, missing and filled (DMF) figures at whole-mouth level

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Resin-based fissure sealant plus fluoride varnish vs Fluoride varnish alone
Changes from baseline in decayed, missing and filled (DMF) figures at whole-mouth level · Children and adolescents from the general population, younger than 20 years of age at the start of the study · 2 years
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of… (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes
Splieth 2001: whole-mouth mean DMFS increased from 0.2 to 0.6 after 1 year and to 1.1 after 2 years; most caries on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars (50.9%).1 study · 92 participantsGRADE not reported
Resin-based fissure sealant plus fluoride varnish vs Fluoride varnish alone
Changes in decayed, missing and filled (DMF) figures at whole-mouth level · Children and adolescents from the general population, younger than 20 years of age at the start of the study · 2 years
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of… (2016) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003067.PUB4, superseded
Splieth 2001: whole-mouth mean DMFS increased from 0.2 to 0.6 after 1 year and to 1.1 after 2 years; most caries on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars (50.9%).1 study · 92 participantsGRADE not reported
Resin-based fissure sealant plus fluoride varnish vs Fluoride varnish alone
Changes in decayed, missing and filled (DMF) figures at whole-mouth level · Children and adolescents under 20 years of age · 2 years
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of… (2010) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003067.PUB3, superseded
Splieth 2001: mean whole-mouth DMFS increased from 0.2 to 0.6 after 1 year and to 1.1 after 2 years.1 study · 98 participantsGRADE not reported
Resin-based fissure sealant plus fluoride varnish vs Fluoride varnish alone
Changes in decayed, missing and filled (DMF) figures at whole-mouth level · Children and adolescents under 20 years of age · 2 years
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of… (2006) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003067.PUB2, superseded
Splieth 2001: mean DMFS score of the whole mouth increased from 0.2 to 0.6 after 1 year and to 1.1 after 2 years; most caries still occurred on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars (50.9%).1 study · 98 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents
2020 · Cochrane All outcomes
19 March 2020list not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.