Question · asked by 1 review

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs no surfactant administration: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Population
preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome
Intervention
Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA)
Comparison
no surfactant administration
Outcome
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) showed no clear difference in bronchopulmonary dysplasia (clinical definition) among survivors compared with no surfactant administration (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs no surfactant administration
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (clinical definition) among survivors · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome
Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) showed no clear difference in bronchopulmonary dysplasia (clinical definition) among survivors compared with no surfactant administration (low certainty).
Laryngeal mask airway surfactant administration for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants… (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.65 [0.85, 3.22]2 studies · 129 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Laryngeal mask airway surfactant administration for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants with or at risk of…
2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.