Question · asked by 1 review
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping: Spontaneous vaginal birth
- Population
- pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
- Intervention
- One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping
- Comparison
- another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping
- Outcome
- Spontaneous vaginal birth
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in spontaneous vaginal birth compared with another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping Spontaneous vaginal birth · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation). One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in spontaneous vaginal birth compared with another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping (moderate certainty). Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1 [0.86, 1.17] | 1 study · 234 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.