Question · asked by 1 review

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care vs usual care: Differences in quality of life (

Population
Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)
Intervention
Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care
Comparison
usual care
Outcome
Differences in quality of life (

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life (mean difference) at longest compared with usual care (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care vs usual care
Health‐related quality of life (mean difference) at longest · residents of aged care facilities
Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life (mean difference) at longest compared with usual care (low certainty).
Models for delivery and co‐ordination of primary or secondary health care (or both) to older adults living… (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 0.01612 studies · 4016 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Models for delivery and co‐ordination of primary or secondary health care (or both) to older adults living in aged care facilities
2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.