Question · asked by 1 review

Sphenopalatine ganglion block vs no treatment/placebo: Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale)

Population
septal surgery
Intervention
Sphenopalatine ganglion block
Comparison
no treatment/placebo
Outcome
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 3 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Sphenopalatine ganglion block vs no treatment/placebo
Pain intensity at 12 hours postoperatively ‐ not reported · septal surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Perioperative local anaesthesia for reducing pain following septal surgery (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found
Sphenopalatine ganglion block vs no treatment/placebo
Pain intensity at 24 hours postoperatively ‐ not reported · septal surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Perioperative local anaesthesia for reducing pain following septal surgery (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found
Sphenopalatine ganglion block vs no treatment/placebo
Pain intensity at 48 hours postoperatively ‐ not reported · septal surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Perioperative local anaesthesia for reducing pain following septal surgery (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Perioperative local anaesthesia for reducing pain following septal surgery
2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.