Low‐dose hCG vs FSH throughout the COH: Clinical pregnancy
Low‐dose hCG showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy compared with FSH throughout the COH (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Low‐dose hCG vs FSH throughout the COH Clinical pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques Low‐dose hCG showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy compared with FSH throughout the COH (low certainty). FSH replaced by low‐dose hCG in the late follicular phase versus continued FSH for assisted reproductive… (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.19 [0.92, 1.55] | 5 studies · 351 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| FSH replaced by low‐dose hCG in the late follicular phase versus continued FSH for assisted reproductive techniques 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.