Question · asked by 1 review

Suprasorb CNP system vs the ABThera system: Proportion of participants with successful primary fascial closure of the abdomen

It is very uncertain whether suprasorb CNP system changes proportion of participants with successful primary fascial closure… compared with the ABThera system (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Suprasorb CNP system vs the ABThera system
Proportion of participants with successful primary fascial closure of the abdomen · adults with an open abdomen after surgery who have not experienced trauma
It is very uncertain whether suprasorb CNP system changes proportion of participants with successful primary fascial closure… compared with the ABThera system (very low certainty).
Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non‐trauma patients (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.8 [0.56, 1.14]1 study · 34 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non‐trauma patients
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.