Question · asked by 0 reviews

Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device: Quality of visualisation of root canal anatomy and morphology

Population
Patients who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 4 years after treatment
Intervention
Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes)
Comparison
Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device
Outcome
Quality of visualisation of root canal anatomy and morphology

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device
Quality of visualisation of root canal anatomy and morphology · Patients who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 4 years after treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Magnification devices for endodontic therapy (2006) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD005969, superseded
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Magnification devices for endodontic therapy
2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
2015-10Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.