Question · asked by 1 review
Observed population vs Not applicable: Plaque/gingivitis visible in at least one oral region
- Population
- School children aged 11-17 years in Sharjah
- Intervention
- Observed population
- Comparison
- Not applicable
- Outcome
- Plaque/gingivitis visible in at least one oral region
Plaque or gingivitis was visible in at least one oral region in 95% of participants.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Observed population vs Not applicable Plaque/gingivitis visible in at least one oral region · School children aged 11-17 years in Sharjah · Overall Plaque or gingivitis was visible in at least one oral region in 95% of participants. Oral Health of Children and Adolescents in the United Arab Emirates: A Systematic Review of the Past Decade. (2021) All outcomes | Prevalence 95 | 1 study · 803 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral Health of Children and Adolescents in the United Arab Emirates: A Systematic Review of the Past Decade. 2021 All outcomes | May 4, 2021 | 42 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.