Question · asked by 1 review
Very tight vs tight‐moderate glycaemic control (infant outcomes): Caesarean section
- Population
- pregnant women with pre‐existing type 1 diabetes
- Intervention
- Very tight
- Comparison
- tight‐moderate glycaemic control (infant outcomes)
- Outcome
- Caesarean section
It is very uncertain whether very tight changes caesarean section compared with tight‐moderate glycaemic control (maternal outcomes) (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Very tight vs tight‐moderate glycaemic control (maternal outcomes) Caesarean section · pregnant women with pre‐existing type 1 diabetes It is very uncertain whether very tight changes caesarean section compared with tight‐moderate glycaemic control (maternal outcomes) (very low certainty). Different intensities of glycaemic control for pregnant women with pre‐existing diabetes (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.92 [0.49, 1.73] | 1 study · 22 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Different intensities of glycaemic control for pregnant women with pre‐existing diabetes 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.