Summary of findings table ‐ More time vs less time: Serious adverse events/death: medium‐term outcomes
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ More time changes serious adverse events/death: medium‐term outcomes compared with less time (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ More time vs less time Serious adverse events/death: medium‐term outcomes · rehabilitation (medium‐term outcomes) It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ More time changes serious adverse events/death: medium‐term outcomes compared with less time (very low certainty). The effect of time spent in rehabilitation on activity limitation and impairment after stroke (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.32 [0.63, 2.76] | 3 studies · 344 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| The effect of time spent in rehabilitation on activity limitation and impairment after stroke 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.