Question · asked by 1 review
Eculizumab vs placebo: Health‐related quality of life European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ‐C30). Scale from: 0 to 100 (a higher score means a better outcome)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Eculizumab vs placebo Health‐related quality of life European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ‐C30). Scale from: 0 to 100 (a higher score means a better outcome) · patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria Eculizumab for treating patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 87 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eculizumab for treating patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.