Question · asked by 1 review
Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions vs usual care or attention control: Number of people who experienced 1 or more hospitalisations following a fall
- Population
- Older people living in the community
- Intervention
- Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions
- Comparison
- usual care or attention control
- Outcome
- Number of people who experienced 1 or more hospitalisations following a fall
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions vs usual care or attention control Number of people who experienced 1 or more hospitalisations following a fall · older people living in the community The review found no eligible studies for this question. Environmental interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.