Question · asked by 1 review

Cranberry extract / juice and proanthocyanidin (flavonoid) fractions vs Untreated or vehicle control (some studies vs positive antimicrobial controls, e.g. chlorhexidine/fluoride): Biofilm morphological changes

Cranberry extract alters S. mutans biofilm morphology/architecture (4 studies; ungraded).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Cranberry extract / juice and proanthocyanidin (flavonoid) fractions vs Untreated or vehicle control (some studies vs positive antimicrobial controls, e.g. chlorhexidine/fluoride)
Biofilm morphological changes · Streptococcus mutans (in vitro cultures and biofilms) · in vitro (laboratory)
Cranberry extract alters S. mutans biofilm morphology/architecture (4 studies; ungraded).
Effect of flavonoids from grape seed and cranberry extracts on the microbiological activity of Streptococcus… (2024) All outcomes
Cranberry treatment disrupted biofilm integrity with agglutination/cell degradation at higher concentrations (Singhal), reduced polymicrobial biomass 38% at 96 h (Philip 2019), produced defective accumulation and…4 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Effect of flavonoids from grape seed and cranberry extracts on the microbiological activity of Streptococcus mutans: a systematic review…
2024 All outcomes
2023-12-3022Critically Low / Critically Low

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.