Question · asked by 1 review
Autofluorescence-guided bone surgery vs Conventional bone surgery: Healing of MRONJ
- Population
- People with established (manifest) MRONJ
- Intervention
- Autofluorescence-guided bone surgery
- Comparison
- Conventional bone surgery
- Outcome
- Healing of MRONJ
It is very uncertain whether autofluorescence-guided bone surgery changes healing of MRONJ compared with conventional bone surgery (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Autofluorescence-guided bone surgery vs Conventional bone surgery Healing of MRONJ · People with established (manifest) MRONJ · 1 year It is very uncertain whether autofluorescence-guided bone surgery changes healing of MRONJ compared with conventional bone surgery (very low certainty). Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 1.08 [0.85, 1.37] | 1 study · 30 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw 2022 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2021-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.