Question · asked by 1 review
Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance: Number of visits to complete treatment
- Population
- Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first molars; patients with cleft lip and palate or other craniofacial problems excluded
- Intervention
- Intraoral distalising appliance
- Comparison
- Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance
- Outcome
- Number of visits to complete treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance Number of attendances required to complete treatment · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to… The review found no eligible studies for this question. Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes | Number of attendances required to complete treatment was not reported by these studies. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2012-12 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance) · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.