Question · asked by 1 review

Concentrated growth factor (CGF) and primary wound closure vs primary closure: Healing of MRONJ (soft tissue healing)

Population
Women with osteoporosis and established MRONJ
Intervention
Concentrated growth factor (CGF) and primary wound closure
Comparison
primary closure
Outcome
Healing of MRONJ (soft tissue healing)

It is very uncertain whether concentrated growth factor (CGF) and primary wound closure changes healing of MRONJ (soft tissue healing) compared with primary wound closure only (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Concentrated growth factor (CGF) and primary wound closure vs Primary wound closure only
Healing of MRONJ (soft tissue healing) · Women with osteoporosis and established MRONJ · 6 months
It is very uncertain whether concentrated growth factor (CGF) and primary wound closure changes healing of MRONJ (soft tissue healing) compared with primary wound closure only (very low certainty).
Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 1.38 [0.81, 2.34]1 study · 28 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-06Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.