Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs other (psychoeducational) parenting intervention: parent mental health and infant attachment: Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: post‐intervention ‐ attachment category (SSP) disorganised Ainsworth Strange Situation
Parent‐infant psychotherapy showed no clear difference in infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: post‐intervention ‐… compared with other (psychoeducational) parenting intervention: parent mental… (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs other (psychoeducational) parenting intervention: parent mental health and infant attachment Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: post‐intervention ‐ attachment category disorganised Ainsworth Strange Situation · participants with improving parental and infant mental health Parent‐infant psychotherapy showed no clear difference in infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: post‐intervention ‐… compared with other (psychoeducational) parenting intervention: parent mental… (low certainty). Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.79 [0.34, 1.82] | 1 study · 36 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.