Question · asked by 1 review
Digital technology vs usual care: Quality of life: change from baseline in CFQ‐R
- Population
- adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis
- Intervention
- Digital technology
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Quality of life: change from baseline in CFQ‐R
Digital technology showed no clear difference in qoL: change from baseline in CFQ‐R score compared with usual care (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Digital technology vs usual care QoL: change from baseline in CFQ‐R score · adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis Digital technology showed no clear difference in qoL: change from baseline in CFQ‐R score compared with usual care (moderate certainty). Digital technology for early identification of exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 60 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital technology for early identification of exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.