Question · asked by 1 review

Life (calcium hydroxide pulp-capping material) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE): Clinical symptoms at 12 months

Population
Adults (aged 20 to 60 years, mean 27) with deep carious lesions in permanent teeth (indirect or direct pulp capping, or complete caries removal)
Intervention
Life (calcium hydroxide pulp-capping material)
Comparison
Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)
Outcome
Clinical symptoms at 12 months

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Life (calcium hydroxide material) vs Cavitec (zinc oxide eugenol material)
Clinical symptoms at 12 months · Adults (aged 20 to 60 years, mean 27) with deep carious lesions in permanent teeth (indirect or direct pulp capping,… · 12 months, Complete caries removal
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane All outcomes
Analysis 2.2 (clinical symptoms at 12 months following complete caries removal, Life vs Cavitec). Fitzgerald 1991: 151 teeth in 55 patients (analysis at tooth level, not patient level); substantial attrition (11 teeth…1 study · 151 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality
2007 · Cochrane All outcomes
2006-03Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.