Question · asked by 1 review
Physiotherapy vs minimal care: Incidence/nature of adverse effects
- Population
- adults with CRPS I
- Intervention
- Physiotherapy
- Comparison
- minimal care
- Outcome
- Incidence/nature of adverse effects
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Physiotherapy vs minimal care Incidence/nature of adverse effects · adults with CRPS I The review found no eligible studies for this question. Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Physiotherapy vs minimal care · adults with CRPS II · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.