Question · asked by 1 review

Preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation) vs Full-term birth (37 weeks or more gestation): Early childhood caries (ECC)

Population
Children aged 6 years or younger (preschool children)
Intervention
Preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation)
Comparison
Full-term birth (37 weeks or more gestation)
Outcome
Early childhood caries (ECC)

In children aged 3 years or younger, preterm birth was not associated with early childhood caries (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.37); certainty not graded.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation) vs Full-term birth (37 weeks or more gestation)
Early childhood caries (ECC) · Children aged 6 years or younger (preschool children) · Community/epidemiological studies of preschool children (multiple countries), Children aged 3 years or younger
In children aged 3 years or younger, preterm birth was not associated with early childhood caries (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.37); certainty not graded.
Relationship between preterm, low birth weight and early childhood caries: a meta-analysis of the… (2020) All outcomes
OR 0.90 [0.59, 1.37]2 studiesGRADE not reported
Preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation) vs Full-term birth (37 weeks or more gestation)
Early childhood caries (ECC) · Children aged 6 years or younger (preschool children) · Community/epidemiological studies of preschool children (multiple countries), Overall
Preterm birth was associated with a significantly increased risk of early childhood caries (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.87); certainty not graded.
Relationship between preterm, low birth weight and early childhood caries: a meta-analysis of the… (2020) All outcomes
OR 1.59 [1.36, 1.87]16 studies · 21279 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Relationship between preterm, low birth weight and early childhood caries: a meta-analysis of the case-control and cross-sectional study.
2020 All outcomes
Up to December 201928Not applicable
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.