Question · asked by 1 review

Heat and moisture exchangers (HME) vs heated humidifiers (HH): All‐cause mortality, over the course of the study

Heat and moisture exchangers (HME) showed no clear difference in mortality ‐ all cause (Measured over 3‐15 days (median 8 days)) compared with heated humidifiers (HH) (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Heat and moisture exchangers (HME) vs heated humidifiers (HH)
Mortality ‐ all cause (Measured over 3‐15 days (median 8 days)) · ventilated adults (18 trials) and children (1 trial)
Heat and moisture exchangers (HME) showed no clear difference in mortality ‐ all cause (Measured over 3‐15 days (median 8 days)) compared with heated humidifiers (HH) (low certainty).
Heat and moisture exchangers versus heated humidifiers for mechanically ventilated adults and children (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.03 [0.89, 1.2]12 studies · 1951 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Heat and moisture exchangers versus heated humidifiers for mechanically ventilated adults and children
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.