Question · asked by 1 review

Acupuncture vs sham control: Caesarean section

Population
women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Intervention
Acupuncture
Comparison
sham control
Outcome
Caesarean section

Acupuncture showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with sham control (high certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Acupuncture vs sham control
Caesarean section · women due for third trimester induction of labour
Acupuncture showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with sham control (high certainty).
Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.8 [0.56, 1.15]8 studies · 789 participantsHigh

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.