Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) vs admission to hospital without CGA: Living at home (end of
Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) leads to higher living at home (end of compared with admission to hospital without CGA (high certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) vs admission to hospital without CGA Living at home (end of · older adults admitted to hospital Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) leads to higher living at home (end of compared with admission to hospital without CGA (high certainty). Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.06 [1.01, 1.1] | 6799 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.