Question · asked by 0 reviews
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect laminate veneer (resin composite or porcelain): Patient satisfaction
- Population
- Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
- Intervention
- Direct resin composite veneer
- Comparison
- Indirect laminate veneer (resin composite or porcelain)
- Outcome
- Patient satisfaction
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Direct laminate veneer (resin composite) vs Indirect laminate veneer (resin composite or porcelain) Patient satisfaction · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations The review found no eligible studies for this question. Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2003) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004347, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2003-11 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate… · 1 review
- Direct resin composite veneer vs Porcelain (indirect) veneer · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.