Question · asked by 1 review
Observed population vs Not applicable: Severe tooth wear prevalence
- Population
- School children aged 2.6-6.8 years in Abu Dhabi
- Intervention
- Observed population
- Comparison
- Not applicable
- Outcome
- Severe tooth wear prevalence
Severe tooth wear prevalence was 0.15%.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Observed population vs Not applicable Severe tooth wear prevalence · School children aged 2.6-6.8 years in Abu Dhabi · Overall Severe tooth wear prevalence was 0.15%. Oral Health of Children and Adolescents in the United Arab Emirates: A Systematic Review of the Past Decade. (2021) All outcomes | Proportion of examined teeth (severe tooth wear) 0.15 | 1 study · 9213 teeth (from 506 children examined) participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral Health of Children and Adolescents in the United Arab Emirates: A Systematic Review of the Past Decade. 2021 All outcomes | May 4, 2021 | 42 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.