Question · asked by 1 review

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) vs Inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block): Patient preference

Population
Patients with atrophic posterior mandibles (5 to 7 mm above the mandibular canal) needing implants
Intervention
Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest)
Comparison
Inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block)
Outcome
Patient preference

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) led to lower patient preference compared with inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block); GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) vs Inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block)
Patient preference · Patients with atrophic posterior mandibles (5 to 7 mm above the mandibular canal) needing implants · 1 month after definitive prostheses
Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) led to lower patient preference compared with inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block); GRADE not reported.
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental… (2009) · Cochrane All outcomes
OR 0.03 [0.00, 0.64]1 study · 10 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment
2009 · Cochrane All outcomes
2009-06Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.