Question · asked by 1 review
Fornix vs limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps: Vision‐related quality of life
- Population
- People with glaucoma
- Intervention
- Fornix
- Comparison
- limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps
- Outcome
- Vision‐related quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fornix vs limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps Quality of life, assessed by vision‐specific questionnaires · patients with glaucoma The review found no eligible studies for this question. Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Fornix vs limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps Quality of life, assessed by vision‐specific questionnaires · patients with glaucoma The review found no eligible studies for this question. Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD009380.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.