Operative hysteroscopy vs control: Clinical pregnancya Ultrasound 4 intrauterine insemination cycles
Operative hysteroscopy may leads to higher clinical pregnancya Ultrasound 4 intrauterine insemination cycles compared with control (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Operative hysteroscopy vs control Clinical pregnancya Ultrasound 4 intrauterine insemination cycles · subfertile women with endometrial polyps diagnosed by ultrasonography prior to treatment with gonadotropin and… Operative hysteroscopy may leads to higher clinical pregnancya Ultrasound 4 intrauterine insemination cycles compared with control (low certainty). Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 4.41 [2.45, 7.96] | 1 study · 204 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.