Question · asked by 1 review
LAMA add‐on vs long‐acting beta2‐agonists (LABA) add‐on: ACQ score Scale = 0 to 6 (0 = no impairment; 6 = maximum impairment)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Long‐acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) add‐on vs long‐acting beta2‐agonists (LABA) add‐on ACQ total 0 = no impairment; 6 = maximum impairment 23 weeks · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS Long‐acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) added to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus addition of… (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 1483 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long‐acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) added to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus addition of long‐acting beta₂‐agonists (LABA) for… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.