Question · asked by 1 review
Comparison of plasma transfusions vs no plasma transfusions when the INR is 1.5 prior to central venous catheter insertion: All‐cause mortality
- Population
- people with abnormal coagulation requiring a central venous catheter
- Intervention
- Comparison of plasma transfusions
- Comparison
- no plasma transfusions when the INR is 1.5 prior to central venous catheter insertion
- Outcome
- All‐cause mortality
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Comparison of plasma transfusions vs no plasma transfusions when the INR is 1.5 prior to central venous catheter insertion All‐cause mortality · people with abnormal coagulation requiring a central venous catheter The review found no eligible studies for this question. Plasma transfusions prior to insertion of central lines for people with abnormal coagulation (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma transfusions prior to insertion of central lines for people with abnormal coagulation 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.