Question · asked by 1 review
Conscious sedation and analgesia (CSA) + paracervical block (PCB) vs PCB: Intraoperative pain
- Population
- women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction
- Intervention
- Conscious sedation and analgesia (CSA) + paracervical block (PCB)
- Comparison
- PCB
- Outcome
- Intraoperative pain
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Conscious sedation and analgesia (CSA) + paracervical block (PCB) vs PCB Intraoperative pain · women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction The review found no eligible studies for this question. Pain relief for women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pain relief for women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Conscious sedation and analgesia (CSA) + paracervical block (PCB) vs spinal anaesthesia · women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction · 1 review
- Conscious sedation and analgesia (CSA) + paracervical block (PCB) vs CSA · women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction · 1 review
- Conscious sedation and analgesia (CSA) + paracervical block (PCB) vs general anaesthesia · women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction · 1 review
- Conscious sedation and analgesia (CSA) + paracervical block (PCB) vs electro‐acupuncture + PCB · women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.