Question · asked by 1 review

Epilepsy (as exposure/condition) vs Healthy controls: Caries in primary teeth: dmft (3 years)

Population
Children and adolescents with epilepsy
Intervention
Epilepsy (as exposure/condition)
Comparison
Healthy controls
Outcome
Caries in primary teeth: dmft (3 years)

The review found no statistically significant difference in dmft among children or adolescents.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Epilepsy (exposure) vs Healthy participants
dmft index (primary teeth) · Children or adolescents with epilepsy · Children or adolescents
The review found no statistically significant difference in dmft among children or adolescents.
Evaluating the DMFT and dmft indices in people with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) All outcomes
SMD 0.132 [-0.220, 0.484]Not reportedGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Evaluating the DMFT and dmft indices in people with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
2025 All outcomes
Up to October 30, 202412Not applicable

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.