Exercise vs control immediately post intervention: Adverse events The timing of measurement was post‐intervention for all studies
Exercise showed no clear difference in adverse events The timing of measurement was post‐intervention for… compared with control (post‐intervention) (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Exercise vs control (post‐intervention) Adverse events The timing of measurement was post‐intervention for all studies · people with multiple sclerosis (including people with relapsing‐remitting, secondary progressive or primary… Exercise showed no clear difference in adverse events The timing of measurement was post‐intervention for… compared with control (post‐intervention) (low certainty). Interventions for preventing falls in people with multiple sclerosis (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.25 [0.26, 6.03] | 3 studies · 97 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for preventing falls in people with multiple sclerosis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.