Question · asked by 0 reviews

Antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic acid) vs Placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo): Number of minor postoperative bleeding episodes

Population
People of all ages on VKA or DOAC treatment undergoing oral or dental procedures (therapeutic INR 2.0 to 4.0; people using acetylsalicylic acid excluded)
Intervention
Antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic acid)
Comparison
Placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo)
Outcome
Number of minor postoperative bleeding episodes

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Antifibrinolytic agents (tranexamic acid (TXA) or epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA)) at any dose, route (topical, oral or intravenous), frequency or duration; started before, during or after the procedure vs Placebo, or no intervention, or usual care with or without placebo
Number of minor postoperative bleeding episodes · People of all ages on VKA or DOAC treatment undergoing oral or dental procedures (therapeutic INR 2.0 to 4.0; people… · Postoperative up to 10 days (immediate <24 h; delayed 24 h to 10 days)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Antifibrinolytic therapy for preventing oral bleeding in people on anticoagulants undergoing minor oral… (2016) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD012293, superseded
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Antifibrinolytic therapy for preventing oral bleeding in people on anticoagulants undergoing minor oral surgery or dental extractions
2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
2018-02Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.