Psychosocial interventions vs no intervention: Continuous abstinence longest
- Population
- adults with stimulant use disorder
- Intervention
- Psychosocial interventions
- Comparison
- no intervention
- Outcome
- Continuous abstinence longest
Summary of findings table ‐ Any psychosocial intervention showed no clear difference in continuous abstinence, longest compared with no intervention (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Any psychosocial intervention vs no intervention Continuous abstinence, longest · adults with stimulant use disorder Summary of findings table ‐ Any psychosocial intervention showed no clear difference in continuous abstinence, longest compared with no intervention (low certainty). Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.14 [0.85, 1.54] | 3 studies · 266 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Psychosocial interventions vs treatment · adults with stimulant use disorder · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.