Question · asked by 1 review
Association of brushing and effervescent tablets vs no treatment: Fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed)
- Population
- Maxillary complete denture (CD) wearers
- Intervention
- Association of brushing and effervescent tablets
- Comparison
- no treatment
- Outcome
- Fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed)
Association of brushing and effervescent tablets led to lower fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Association of brushing and effervescent tablets vs No treatment Fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) · Maxillary complete denture (CD) wearers Association of brushing and effervescent tablets led to lower fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported. Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults (2009) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD -3.75 [-4.16, -3.34] | 1 study · 18 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes | May 2009 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.