Question · asked by 1 review
Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (S‐ETT): Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia
- Population
- preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome
- Intervention
- Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA)
- Comparison
- surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (S‐ETT)
- Outcome
- Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs surfactant administration via endotracheal tube (ETT) with extubation at standard criteria (S‐ETT) Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome The review found no eligible studies for this question. Laryngeal mask airway surfactant administration for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants… (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laryngeal mask airway surfactant administration for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants with or at risk of… 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs surfactant administration via endotracheal tube (ETT) with the intent to rapidly extubate (InSurE) · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome · 1 review
- Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs no surfactant administration · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.